4.4 Article

Topology Optimization of Acoustic-Mechanical Structures for Enhancing Sound Quality

期刊

ACTA MECHANICA SOLIDA SINICA
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10338-023-00408-w

关键词

Acoustic-structure; Topology optimization; Moving morphable component (MMC); Sound performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sound quality is crucial for evaluating acoustic device performance. This study proposes an explicit topology optimization approach to enhance the sound quality of acoustic-mechanical structures, using frequency response within a specified range to describe sound quality. The moving morphable component (MMC)-based approach is employed for topology design, while the mixed finite element method is used for sound quality evaluation. Numerical examples demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in improving sound quality.
Sound quality is one of the essential criteria for measuring the acoustic performance of acoustic devices. In contrast to the optimization of sound characteristics, both the quantitative description of sound quality and the numerical instability that may occur during optimization need to be investigated. In the present work, an explicit topology optimization approach is proposed to enhance the sound quality of acoustic-mechanical structures, where the sound quality is described, resorting to frequency response within a specified frequency band. To this end, the moving morphable component (MMC)-based approach is adopted to achieve the explicit topology design, and the mixed finite element method is introduced to evaluate the sound quality. With the use of the explicit description of MMC, the acoustic-structure boundary can be captured accurately, which is important for acoustic response analysis. Moreover, a regularization topology optimization formulation is also developed to avoid the numerical issues produced in some special frequency bands. Numerical examples demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in improving sound quality performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据