4.6 Article

Computational characterization of the temperature field in coaxial nitrogen injection under supercritical conditions

期刊

ACTA ASTRONAUTICA
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 329-338

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.08.004

关键词

Transcritical mixing; Supercritical mixing; Liquid rocket engines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This document addresses the modeling of fluids in the supercritical regime, specifically in liquid-propelled rocket engines. Nitrogen is used as a surrogate for oxygen-hydrogen mixture to investigate turbulence mixing without combustion and chemical reactions. The temperature field validation for nitrogen coaxial injection at supercritical conditions is crucial for the stable operation of liquid rocket motors.
The modeling of fluids in the supercritical regime is addressed at conditions characteristic of liquid-propelled rocket engines, whose increasing performance demands paved the way for supercritical conditions. In the present document, nitrogen is used as a surrogate for the commonly encountered oxygen-hydrogen mixture so that turbulence mixing can be looked into without influences from combustion and chemically reacting effects. The temperature field validation on nitrogen coaxial injection at supercritical conditions, with high-velocity ratios (outer-to-inner), where the main (inner) stream is recessed relative to the outer stream, is of paramount importance in the flame stabilization operation of liquid rocket motors. The temperature field is analyzed taking into account varying momentum and velocity ratios, whose increased leads to a reduction of potential core lengths, increasing jet spreading. The results also depict a fundamental influence of thermal effects, dominating over the transport of momentum. The experimental data and large eddy simulation solvers from the literature agree with the estimate of injection velocities at several conditions and comparable to the space shuttle main engine pre-burner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据