4.0 Article

Effects of early social mixing and genetic line on female piglet activity, pen location and social interactions pre- and post-weaning under Swedish commercial pig production conditions

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/09064702.2023.2245416

关键词

Piglet; female; social environment; co-mingling; genetic dam line; social behaviour; socialisation; general behaviour; animal welfare; early life; >

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the behavior of female piglets intended for breeding in terms of activity, preferred pen location, and social interactions. The results showed that piglets who had access to the neighboring pen spent more time there and spent less time lying down before weaning compared to those without access. After weaning, piglets without access to the neighboring pen increased their time in the piglet corner and spent less time lying down. The study confirmed the positive effects of early social mixing on piglets' behavioral responses to weaning, even when the sows are individually loose-housed.
This study investigated activity, preferred pen location and social interactions in female piglets (0-10 weeks of age, N = 98) intended for breeding. Piglets were housed in pens where the sow and the piglets were loose-housed without (CP) or with access to the neighbouring pen week 2-5 (AP). Female piglets of two genetic lines (Dutch and Swedish Yorkshire (DY, SY)) from 26 litters were selected within 24 h after birth. DY piglets in the AP treatment spent more time in the neighbouring pen than SY (24.0% vs 19.0%), while AP piglets of both genetic lines spent less time lying down before weaning than CP. At weaning, CP piglets increased their time in the piglet corner and spent less time lying. SY piglets were less responsive to social interactions. The results confirm previous findings on favourable effects of early social mixing on piglets' behavioural responses to weaning also when sows are individually loose-housed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据