4.8 Article

Multicolor Electrochromic Display and Patterned Device Based on Hollow-SiO2-Supported WO3 Photonic Crystals

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 15, 期 35, 页码 41763-41771

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c09956

关键词

electrochromic devices; structural colors; photonic crystals; WO3; inverse opals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a hollow-SiO2-supported WO3 photonic crystal with tunable refractive index, resulting in large-area PC samples with good surface morphology and bright multicolor output. The pixelated structure can dynamically display different numeric and alphabetic patterns.
Electrochromic photonic crystals (PCs) have been intensively studied in the field of display, sensors, and intelligent materials due to their tunable brilliant structural colors. The mostly studied electrochromic PCs are based on the tunable lattice parameter after electrifying; namely, the electrochromic process is caused by the structural change of PCs. Besides the lattice parameter, the refractive index is another key factor to determine the structural color of PCs. Here, a kind of hollow-SiO2-supported WO3 (H-SiO2/WO3) PCs is designed, where the refractive index of the WO3 portion is changeable under charging. Benefiting from the support effect and tunable thickness of H-SiO2, large-area PC samples with good surface morphology and bright multicolor output are prepared. The reflection peaks of these composite PCs can shift by 30-90 nm, and their corresponding colors changed obviously after the voltage was applied. After being pixelated by laser-marking, the H-SiO2/WO3 PCs can dynamically display different numeric and alphabetic patterns in an electric-driven writing and erasing process. Not only does this composite PC structure broaden the color change range of WO3-based materials but also avoids the structural change in the electrochromic process. This work provides more possibilities for electrochromic PCs in the field of color-changing pattern displays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据