4.1 Article

Analysis of the Binding Mechanism of Bioactive Coumarins with Ovalbumin: Further Investigation into the Inhibitory Effects toward Protein Fibrillation

期刊

ACS FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 3, 期 5, 页码 866-880

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.3c00055

关键词

ovalbumin; 7-hydroxycomarin; 4-methyl-7-hydroxycoumarin; OVA fibrillation; docking; molecular dynamics simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the molecular interactions and inhibitory effects of two bioactive coumarin derivatives, 7-hydroxycoumarin and 4-methyl-7-hydroxycoumarin, on the main food allergen from egg white, ovalbumin. The results showed that these coumarin derivatives could effectively inhibit OVA aggregation and induce conformational changes of OVA.
Two bioactive coumarin derivatives, 7-hydroxycoumarin (7-HC) and 4-methyl-7-hydroxycoumarin (4-Me-7-HC), were used to investigate the molecular interactions with the main food allergen from egg white, ovalbumin (OVA), along with their inhibitory effects on OVA aggregation. The mechanism of binding interaction was elucidated by multispectroscopic and computational methods. Circular dichroism (CD) and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) experiments confirmed the ligand-induced conformational changes of OVA. The fluorescence spectroscopic experiments demonstrated that the quenching mechanism was an unusual static quenching method with binding constants (Kb) in the range of 104 M-1, indicating a moderate nature of binding between OVA and coumarins. Thioflavin T (ThT) and Congo red (CR) binding assays confirmed the production of OVA fibrils, and the aggregation was shown to be inhibited by the coumarin derivatives in vitro. Thermodynamic parameters for OVA-7-HC/4-Me-7-HC interactions showed positive Delta H and Delta S values, indicating hydrophobic forces predominated in the binding processes and a negative Delta G value, implying the spontaneity of the complex formation, which was then further confirmed by computational studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据