4.1 Article

Revaluing Anion Effects on Maillard Reaction Catalysis as a Relevant Feature for Kinetic Predictions

期刊

ACS FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 3, 期 6, 页码 1021-1029

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.3c00029

关键词

Maillard reaction; acid-base catalysis; anions; basicity constants; dissolution enthalpies; Jones-Dole viscosity constant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of organic and inorganic anions on the Maillard reaction in glucose-glycine systems was studied under conditions of 100 degrees C and pH close to neutrality. The progress of the Maillard reaction was measured using spectrophotometric, pH changes, and colorimetric methods. Different trends were observed depending on the nature of the anion. Anions with basic properties showed an exponential correlation with the Maillard reaction kinetic constants, while anions with no acid-base properties exhibited a linear correlation with the water dissolution enthalpies of their sodium salts.
The influence of organic and inorganic anions on theMaillard reaction(MR) in glucose-glycine systems at 100 degrees C and pH closeto neutrality was analyzed. The progress of MR markers was followedat the intermediate and final stages by spectrophotometric, pH changes,and colorimetric measurements. Two different trends were found dependingon the nature of the anion. Systems with anions displaying basic propertiesshowed an exponential correlation between the MR kinetic constantsand their basicity constant values. On the other hand, systems containinganions with no acid-base properties exhibited a linear correlationbetween water dissolution enthalpies of their sodium salts and MRconstants, indicating both a zwitterionic glycine-anion interactioncatalytic effect and a relationship with their Jones-Dole viscosityconstants. Finally, at a given heating time, the present anion definedthe chromatic aspects of the samples, provided that the rest of thecompositional variables were constant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据