4.2 Article

Simultaneous Recovery of NH3-N and Removal of Heavy Metals from Manganese Residue Leachate Using an Electrodialysis System

期刊

ACS ES&T WATER
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.2c00580

关键词

NH3-N; heavy metals; manganese residue leachate; electrodialysis; ecotoxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel electrodialysis system with a self-growing titanium dioxide nanowire (TiO2 NW) electrode is proposed to recover NH3-N and remove heavy metals from manganese residue leachate (MRL), which can seriously affect the environment. Plant growth experiments and ecotoxicity studies are conducted to evaluate the ecological risks of the reuse of recovered NH3-N. The results show that the electrodialysis system can achieve high removal rates of heavy metals and recovery of NH3-N from MRL, and the recovered NH3-N can promote plant growth and optimize soil fertility.
The problem of high concentration of NH3-N and heavy metals in manganese residue leachate (MRL) needs to be solved urgently as it can harm the surrounding soil, water bodies, and even the ecological system. In this study, a novel electrodialysis system with a self-growing titanium dioxide nanowire (TiO2 NW) electrode is proposed to recover NH3-N and remove heavy metals from MRL. Plant growth experiments and ecotoxicity studies are used to evaluate the ecological risks of the reuse of recovered NH3-N. In the electrodialysis system with a proton membrane to separate the two chambers, 87%-97% removal of heavy metals and 95% recovery of NH3-N from MRL can be achieved. The obtained recovery solution from the cathode chamber can greatly promote the plant growth. The ecotoxicity experiment results further reveal that the recovered NH3-N can optimize the soil microbial community structure by promoting the reproduction of the genus Bacillus and thus improve soil fertility. This work can provide a new perspective on the harmless disposal and resource recovery of MRL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据