4.1 Article

Impacts of Salinity on the Hydrolysis of Chlorpyrifos

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsagscitech.2c00234

关键词

hydrolysis; chlorpyrifos; salinity; seawater; copper; sodium chloride; organic contaminant; pesticide; degradation; surface water

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos to assess the effects of salinity and trace metals on its hydrolysis rate in seawater. It found that high salinity seawater and trace amounts of copper accelerated the hydrolysis rate, while sodium chloride significantly inhibited it. The research highlights the importance of considering the combined influences of salinity and trace metals when evaluating the environmental fate of hydrophobic organic compounds in aquatic ecosystems.
The organophosphate insecticide, chlorpyrifos, was used as a probe to assess the individual effects of salinity and trace metals in seawater on its hydrolysis rate as their influence on organic chemicals remains poorly characterized. This investigation measured the hydrolytic degradation of chlorpyrifos to its transformation product, 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCP), in five sterilized/buffered media: 25 parts per thousand (ppt) artificial seawater, 25 ppt sodium chloride (NaCl), 10 parts per billion (ppb) copper, 0.5 ppb copper, and buffered deionized water (0 ppt). Chlorpyrifos hydrolyzed 21, 62, and 13% faster in 25 ppt seawater, 10 ppb copper, and 0.5 ppb copper, respectively, and 40% slower in 25 ppt NaCl compared to 0 ppt. The formation of TCP in each medium was consistent with the observed degradation of chlorpyrifos. Trace amounts of copper at concentrations similar to those observed in freshwater environments and seawater accelerated the hydrolytic rate, while NaCl significantly inhibited it. This research illustrates the importance of considering the combined influences of trace metals as well as salinity when evaluating the environmental fate of hydrophobic organic compounds in aquatic ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据