4.5 Article

Development and application of optical fibre strain and pressure sensors for in-flight measurements

期刊

MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/27/10/104001

关键词

flight test; fibre Bragg grating; extrinsic fibre Fabry-Perot interferometer

资金

  1. European Framework 7 [266107]
  2. EPSRC [EP/H02252X/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/H02252X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H02252X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibre optic based sensors are becoming increasingly viable as replacements for traditional flight test sensors. Here we present laboratory, wind tunnel and flight test results of fibre Bragg gratings (FBG) used to measure surface strain and an extrinsic fibre Fabry-Perot interferometric (EFFPI) sensor used to measure unsteady pressure. The calibrated full scale resolution and bandwidth of the FBG and EFFPI sensors were shown to be 0.29% at 2.5 kHz up to 600 mu epsilon and 0.15% at up to 10 kHz respectively up to 400 Pa. The wind tunnel tests, completed on a 30% scale model, allowed the EFFPI sensor to be developed before incorporation with the FBG system into a Bulldog aerobatic light aircraft. The aircraft was modified and certified based on Certification Standards 23 (CS-23) and flight tested with steady and dynamic manoeuvres. Aerobatic dynamic manoeuvres were performed in flight including a spin over a g-range -1g to +4g and demonstrated both the FBG and the EFFPI instruments to have sufficient resolution to analyse the wing strain and fuselage unsteady pressure characteristics. The steady manoeuvres from the EFFPI sensor matched the wind tunnel data to within experimental error while comparisons of the flight test and wind tunnel EFFPI results with a Kulite pressure sensor showed significant discrepancies between the two sets of data, greater than experimental error. This issue is discussed further in the paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据