4.6 Article

Reproductive aging is associated with changes in oocyte mitochondrial dynamics, function, and mtDNA quantity

期刊

MATURITAS
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 121-130

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.06.015

关键词

Reproduction; Aging; Oocyte; Mitochondria

资金

  1. National Institute of Health (NIH) [R01HD059909]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81501247]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondria affect numerous aspects of mammalian reproduction. We investigated whether the decrease in oocyte quality associated with aging is related to altered mitochondria. Oocytes from old (12 months) and young (9 weeks) C57BL/6J mice were compared in relation to: mitochondria morphology and dynamics (mitochondria density, coverage, size and shape) throughout folliculogenesis; levels of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA); mitochondrial stress reflected in the expression of mitochondrial unfolded protein response (mt-UPR) genes; and levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) under baseline conditions and following H2O2 treatment. In old mice, mitochondria of primary follicle-enclosed oocytes were smaller, with lower mitochondria coverage (total mitochondria mu m(2)/mu m(2) cytosol area) (p < 0.05). Other follicular stages showed a similar trend, but the changes were not significant. Mature oocytes (Metaphase II-MII) from old mice had significantly less mtDNA (p < 0.01), and elevated mt-UPR gene Hspd1 expression (p < 0.05), compared with those from young mice. ROS levels in aged MII oocytes were also higher following pretreatment with H2O2 (p < 0.05). Aging is associated with altered mitochondrial morphological parameters and decreased mtDNA levels in oocytes, as well as an increase in ROS under stressful conditions and elevated expression of mitochondrial stress response gene Hspdl. Delineation of the mechanisms underlying mitochondrial changes associated with ageing may help in the development of diagnostic and therapeutic tools in reproductive medicine. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据