4.2 Article

Molecular signatures of soil-derived dissolved organic matter constrained by mineral weathering

期刊

FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 377-383

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.01.032

关键词

Soil organic matter; Dissolved organic matter; Chemical composition; Molecular signature; Mineral weathering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the molecular signatures of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in soils and how they vary with degrees of weathering. The results show that weathering-related mineralogical properties have a significant impact on the molecular signature of DOM. Highly weathered acidic soils have higher biolability and lower aromaticity of DOM compared to less weathered soils.
Dissolved organic matter (DOM) in soils drives biogeochemical cycling and soil functions in different directions depending on its molecular signature. Notably, there is a distinct paucity of information concerning how the molecular signatures of soil DOM vary with different degrees of weathering across wide geographic scales. Herein, we resolved the DOM molecular signatures from 22 diverse Chinese reference soils and linked them with soil organic matter and weathering-related mineralogical properties. The mixed-effects models revealed that the yields of DOM were determined by soil organic carbon content, whereas the molecular signature of DOM was primarily constrained by the weathering-related dimension. The soil weathering index showed a positive effect on the lability and a negative effect on the aromaticity of DOM. Specifically, DOM in highly weathered acidic soils featured more amino sugars, carbohydrates, and aliphatics, as well as less O-rich polyphenols and condensed aromatics, thereby conferring a higher DOM biolability and lower DOM aromaticity. This study highlights the dominance of the weathering-related dimension in constraining the molecular signatures and potential functions of DOM in soils across a wide geographic scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据