4.1 Article

Mercury isotope evidence for marine photic zone euxinia across the end-Permian mass extinction

期刊

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-023-00821-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to the evaluation of mercury isotopes from the Meishan Section, China and a global box model, marine photic zone euxinia (PZE) with toxic, sulfide-rich conditions was likely an important kill mechanism and obstacle to recovery during the end-Permian mass extinction (EPME), alongside the dominant influence of volcanism. This model provides further evidence that PZE played a crucial role in both the EPME and the impeded recovery afterward.
Marine photic zone euxinia was likely an important kill mechanism and obstacle to recovery during the end-Permian mass extinction alongside the dominant influence of volcanism, according to a global box model evaluated against mercury isotopes from the Meishan Section, China The driving forces, kill and recovery mechanisms for the end-Permian mass extinction (EPME), the largest Phanerozoic biological crisis, are under debate. Sedimentary records of mercury enrichment and mercury isotopes have suggested the impact of volcanism on the EPME, yet the causes of mercury enrichment and isotope variations remain controversial. Here, we model mercury isotope variations across the EPME to quantitatively assess the effects of volcanism, terrestrial erosion and photic zone euxinia (PZE, toxic, sulfide-rich conditions). Our numerical model shows that while large-scale volcanism remains the main driver of widespread mercury enrichment, the negative shifts of Delta Hg-199 isotope signature across the EPME cannot be fully explained by volcanism or terrestrial erosion as proposed before, but require additional fractionation by marine mercury photoreduction under enhanced PZE conditions. Thus our model provides further evidence for widespread and prolonged PZE as a key kill mechanism for both the EPME and the impeded recovery afterward.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据