3.8 Article

Comparison between serratus anterior plane block versus erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)

期刊

EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 440-445

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/11101849.2023.2216534

关键词

VATS; serratus anterior plane block; erector spinae plane block

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of single-injection US-guided ESPB and SAPB for postoperative analgesia following VATS, with the time until the first analgesic requirement as the main evaluation criterion. The secondary endpoints included adverse effects and total analgesic requirement within the first 24 hours post-operation. The results showed that the SAPB group had a significantly faster time until the first analgesic requirement, but a higher postoperative pethidine requirement compared to the ESPB group. Therefore, US-directed ESPB provides better pain management after VATS.
Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive technique resulting in decrease levels of pain. However, to provide more effective pain control after VATS, this necessitates analgesia that inhibits somatic and visceral nerve fibers. Aim of the study Aim of the study is to compare SAPB or ESPB for postoperative analgesia following VATS, as determined by the time until the first analgesic requirement. Comparisons of adverse effects and total analgesic requirement in the first 24-hour post-operative were the secondary endpoints. Patients and Methods Forty patients participated in this prospective randomized clinical study. At the conclusion of surgery, 20 patients underwent a single-injection US-guided ESPB, and 20 patients underwent a SAPB after VATS. Inclusion Criteria: (ASA) 1-3. Exclusion criteria: Patients 80 years old, patients who refuse to take part in the research, patients have a history of medication allergies, contraindication to regional anesthesia, severe hepatic and renal dysfunction Results As regarding to demographic information, there were no significant changes between the two groups. Timing of the first analgesic requirement was statistically faster among SAPB Group (12.54 +/- 6.46 h) compared to ESPB Group (18.29 +/- 6.05 h). Postoperative pethidine required was significantly higher in SAPB group than in ESBP group [ESPB (35.71 +/- 19.67 mg) < SAPB (63.08 +/- 25.29 mg), with p-value Conclusion Both ESPB and SAPB can be used for pain control after VATS. Our study showed that US-directed ESPB offers more effective pain management than SAPB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据