4.3 Article

Unmet Clinical Needs in the Management of Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease: A Consensus-based Position Paper From an ad hoc Expert Panel

期刊

HEMASPHERE
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000891

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents the results of a discussion among Italian experts regarding the clinical needs in managing idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD). They issued recommendations for clinical decisions and proposed new research in areas such as diagnostic certainty, siltuximab therapy, and alternatives for patients resistant/intolerant to siltuximab therapy. The article aims to improve the practice of iMCD and inform future studies in the field.
Castleman disease describes a group of heterogeneous clinicopathological disorders now included in the tumor-like lesions with B-cell predominance of the World Health Organization classification. Managing idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is challenging, because few systematic studies or comparative randomized clinical trials have been conducted. International, consensus evidence-based guidelines for iMCD were published in 2018, but gaps in the therapeutic options for difficult-to-treat patients, who do not respond to siltuximab and other conventional therapies, still exist. This article presents the results of group discussion among an ad hoc constituted Panel of Italian experts to identify and address unmet clinical needs (UCNs) in managing iMCD. Recommendations on the appropriateness of clinical decisions and proposals for new research concerning the identified UCNs were issued through formalized multiple-step procedures after a comprehensive analysis of the scientific literature. The following key UCNs were addressed: strengthening the diagnostic certainty in iMCD patients before planning first-line therapy; management of siltuximab therapy; choice and management of immune-modulating, or chemotherapy agents in patients resistant/intolerant to siltuximab therapy. While most of the conclusions reached by the Panel are consistent with the existing guidelines, some alternative therapeutic options were stressed, and the discussion contributed to bringing forth the issues that need further investigation. Hopefully, this comprehensive overview will improve the practice of iMCD and inform the design and implementation of new studies in the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据