3.8 Article

Deep Residual Learning Image Recognition Model for Skin Cancer Disease Detection and Classification

期刊

ACTA INFORMATICA PRAGENSIA
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 19-31

出版社

UNIV ECONOMICS, PRAGUE
DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.189

关键词

Skin cancer; Deep learning; Classification; DenseNet121; ResNet152; VGG19; Transfer learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study employed three different deep learning models to classify dermatoscopy images and showed that the improved ResNet152 model outperformed the other models in terms of accuracy and ROC score. The deep residual learning skin cancer recognition system based on this model has the potential to assist dermatologists in diagnosing skin cancer.
Skin cancer is undoubtedly one of the deadliest diseases, and early detection of this disease can save lives. The usefulness and capabilities of deep learning in detecting and categorizing skin cancer based on images have been investigated in many studies. However, due to the variety of skin cancer tumour shapes and colours, deep learning algorithms misclassify whether a tumour is cancerous or benign. In this paper, we employed three different pre-trained state-of-the-art deep learning models: DenseNet121, VGG19 and an improved ResNet152, in classifying a skin image dataset. The dataset has a total of 3297 dermatoscopy images and two diagnostic categories: benign and malignant. The three models are supported by transfer learning and have been tested and evaluated based on the criteria of accuracy, loss, precision, recall, f1 score and ROC. Subsequently, the results show that the improved ResNet152 model significantly outperformed the other models and achieved an accuracy score of 92% and an ROC score of 91%. The DenseNet121 and VGG19 models achieve accuracy scores of 90% and 79% and ROC scores of 88% and 75%, respectively. Subsequently, a deep residual learning skin cancer recognition (ResNetScr) system has been implemented based on the ResNet152 model, and it has the capacity to help dermatologists in diagnosing skin cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据