4.4 Article

Omega-3 LCPUFA supplement: a nutritional strategy to prevent maternal and neonatal oxidative stress

期刊

MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12300

关键词

docosahexaenoic acid (DHA); n-3 fatty acids; pregnancy; infant development; oxidative stress; antioxidant defence

资金

  1. University of Granada
  2. Ministry of Economy and Competitiviness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is controversy about fish-oil supplementation and oxidative damage. This ambiguity should be explored to elucidate its role as modulator of oxidative stress, especially during gestation and postnatal life. This is the objective of this study. One hundred ten pregnant women were divided in two groups: control group CT (400mL/day of the control dairy drink); supplemented group FO (400mL/day of the fish oil-enriched dairy drink (+/- 400-mg EPA-DHA/day)). Different biomarkers of oxidative damage were determined in the mother's at enrolment, at delivery and at 2.5 and 4months postpartum and newborns at delivery and at 2.5months postpartum. Omega-3 LC-PUFA supplementation during pregnancy and lactation decreased plasma hydroperoxides especially in newborn at delivery (P=0.001) and 2.5months (P=0.006), increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) in mothers at delivery (P=0.024 (SOD)) and after 2.5months (P=0.040 (CAT)) and in newborns at 2.5months (P=0.035 (SOD); P=0.021 (CAT)). Also, supplementation increased -tocoferol in mothers at 2.5months (P=0.030) and in umbilical cord artery (P=0.039). Higher levels of CoQ10 were found in mothers at delivery (P=0.039) as well as in umbilical cord vein (P=0.024) and artery (P=0.036). Our supplementation prevents the oxidative stress in the mother and neonate during the first months of postnatal life, being a potential preventive nutritional strategy to prevent functional alterations associated with oxidative stress that have an important repercussion for the neonate development in the early postnatal life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据