4.0 Article

Mapping the helix model of innovation influence on education: A bibliometric review

期刊

FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1142502

关键词

triple helix model; quadruple helix model; quintuple helix model; education; entrepreneurship education; bibliometric analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the growing importance of knowledge in implementing the triple helix model, higher education institutions are playing a more prominent role in regional innovation and development. Research on the helix model is examining the causes and consequences of its evolution in education. This study analyzes the relationship between the triple helix model and education using bibliometric analysis of 227 peer-reviewed articles from 1970 to 2022. The results are crucial for academics, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to improve the helix model in education strategy.
As a direct result of the increased significance of knowledge in the various endeavours attempting to implement the triple helix model, higher education institutions have assumed a more prominent position in the processes involved in regional innovation and development. Expanding study on the helix model is currently examining the underlying causes and consequences of the evolution of the helix model in education. This research examines the relationship between the triple helix model and education by using bibliometric analysis on 227 articles subjected to peer review between 1970 and 2022. This investigation concentrated on three aspects of analysis: (1) document citation via the use of co-citation analysis that produce 4 clusters; (2) document cited reference through the utilisation of bibliographic coupling that generates 5 clusters; and (3) document keyword through the utilisation of co-word analysis with 4 clusters. These results are essential for academics, practitioners, and other interested parties working to improve the helix model for policymakers by putting it into an education strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据