3.8 Article

Development of quality indicators for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections in general practice: a RAND appropriateness method

期刊

BMJ OPEN QUALITY
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002156

关键词

antibiotic management; continuous quality improvement; general practice; performance measures; quality measurement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A set of quality indicators for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of adult patients with suspected urinary tract infections in general practice was developed. Consensus was reached through expert discussion, resulting in 24 quality indicators that can strengthen the focus on managing patients with potential urinary tract infections in general practice.
ObjectiveTo develop a set of quality indicators for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of adult patients with suspected urinary tract infections in general practice. DesignA Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness method was used. SettingDanish general practice. SubjectsA panel of nine experts, mainly general practitioners, was asked to rate the relevance of 27 preliminary quality indicators. The set of indicators was based on the most recent Danish guidelines for the management of patients with suspected urinary tract infection. An online meeting was held to resolve misinterpretations and achieve consensus. Main outcome measuresThe experts were asked to rate the indicators on a nine-point Likert scale. Consensus of appropriateness was reached if the overall panel median rating was 7-9 with agreement. Agreement was defined as: no more than one expert rated the indicator outside the three-point region (1-3, 4-6 and 7-9) containing the median. ResultsA total of 23 of the 27 proposed quality indicators attained consensus. One additional indicator was proposed by the panel of experts, leading to a final set of 24 quality indicators. All indicators focusing on the diagnostic process achieved consensus of appropriateness, while the experts agreed on three quarters of the proposed quality indicators concerning either the treatment decision or the choice of antibiotics. ConclusionThis set of quality indicators may be used to strengthen general practice's focus on the management of patients with a possible urinary tract infection and to identify potential quality problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据