4.2 Article

Corrosion inhibitive effects of calcium-modified zinc phosphate coating on A36 mild steel

期刊

RESULTS IN ENGINEERING
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100880

关键词

Calcium; Coating; Corrosion inhibition; Mild steel; Phosphating; Zinc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The corrosion inhibitive performance of calcium modified zinc phosphate coating on A36 mild steel was studied. The results showed that the calcium modified phosphating process at 80 degrees C with a calcium concentration of 2.5 g/L provided a better and more uniform coating on the steel surface. The adsorption of both calcium and zinc particles on A36 mild steel was found to be a spontaneous and physical process, as indicated by the Freundlich adsorption isotherm and the values of Kads and Delta Gads.
In this work, the corrosion inhibitive performance of calcium modified zinc phosphate coating on A36 mild steel was studied. Treated A36 mild steel samples were subjected to coating through immersion in phosphating bath containing varied concentrations of calcium oxide (0-2.5 g/L) at different operating temperatures (60-80 degrees C) and immersion time (30-60 min). The coated samples were then subjected to corrosion tests (weight loss and inhibition efficiency determination) in 3.5% NaCl solution, to examine the anticorrosion behaviour of the coated mild steel in NaCl solution. The calcium modified phosphating process which was carried out at 80 degrees C with calcium concentration of 2.5 g/L gave a better and more uniform coating on A36 mild steel surface, as confirmed by visual inspection and SEM/EDS analysis. Also, Freundlich adsorption isotherm was found suitable for the prediction of the adsorption of both calcium and zinc particles on A36 mild steel, as indicated by the coefficient of determination (R2) values of approximately one. The adsorption of both the zinc and calcium particles on A36 mild steel was found to be spontaneous and physical process, as revealed by the values of Kads and Delta Gads.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据