3.8 Article

Local peoples' knowledge and perceptions of Australian wattle (Acacia) species invasion, ecosystem services and disservices in grassland landscapes, South Africa

期刊

ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2023.2177495

关键词

agnes Balazsi; Attitudes; ecosystem disservices; ecosystem services; invasive alien plants; perceptions; tree invasions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The commercial forestry industry in South Africa introduced many alien tree species into grassland ecosystems for timber and paper production, leading to their escape into neighbouring farms and community lands. While these alien species now provide valuable ecosystem services, they can also negatively impact the ecosystem depending on the context. This study examines the knowledge and perceptions of invasive wattle species invasion and its associated ecosystem services and disservices among commercial and communal farmers, highlighting their dependence on these services and the differences in their preferences.
Many alien tree species were introduced into grassland ecosystems in South Africa by the commercial forestry industry for paper and timber for furniture. Over decades some of these introduced species escaped into neighbouring farms and community land. Adult trees from these alien species now provide other ecosystem services, notably fuelwood. Depending on the spatio-temporal context, many of these species can also negatively affect ecosystem services. We collected interview data from commercial and communal farmers in the upper Umzimvubu catchment in South Africa to compare farmers' knowledge and perceptions of invasive wattle species invasion and their associated ecosystem services and disservices. Fuelwood and fencing poles were the most common uses of wattle by commercial (83%; 67%) and communal (99%; 49%) farmers. On the other hand, the reduction of grass cover and loss of grazing land were the most commonly mentioned negative impacts of wattles by commercial (83%; 75%) and communal (92%; 80%) farmers. Although both groups recognise the importance of wattles in providing ecosystem services, most communal farmers perceived wattles to have more negative effects than benefits. The findings demonstrate that both farmer groups highly depend on ecosystem services and are affected by disservices of wattles. However, while large-scale commercial households favour the presence of wattles in the landscape, communal households prefer complete removal of the wattles from the landscape. This may be due to lack of locally available alternative options or inability to replace or purchase ecosystem services affected by wattles from other sources or markets like commercial farmers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据