3.8 Review

Empirical Research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Framework in Health Professions Education: A Literature Review

期刊

MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 791-803

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s40670-023-01786-z

关键词

Health professions education; Technological pedagogical content knowledge; TPACK; Technology integration; ICT; Educational technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The review aims to identify research on the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework in the field of health professions education. Nine empirical studies met the selection criteria out of the 76 selected articles from 4 databases. The findings highlighted TPACK level measurement, TPACK relationship with other variables, TPACK application, and professional development as the main themes. Although research on the TPACK framework in the health professions education area is lacking, the results suggest that TPACK as a theoretical foundation has positive outcomes and can guide future practice and investigations.
In the context of twenty-first-century information and communication technologies, the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework is a new way of conceptualizing categories of knowledge required by teachers to achieve technology integration in educational practice. The main purpose of this review is to identify research on the TPACK framework in the field of health professions education. Journal empirical studies from 4 databases are included in this review. Of the 76 selected articles, nine met the selection criteria. The findings in the examined papers highlighted four themes: TPACK level measurement, TPACK relationship with other variables, TPACK application, and professional development. Research on the TPACK framework in the health professions education area is still lacking; however, the finding indicates that the TPACK as a theoretical foundation generated positive outcomes that can guide practitioners and researchers' future practice and investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据