4.3 Review

Bioceramics in Endodontics: Updates and Future Perspectives

期刊

BIOENGINEERING-BASEL
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10030354

关键词

bioceramics; endodontic diseases; vital pulp therapy; root canal therapy; endodontic microsurgery; regenerative endodontic treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioceramics, particularly mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), have been widely used in endodontics for their excellent bioactivity and biocompatibility. Recently, new bioceramics have shown promising clinical outcomes in various endodontic treatments. However, more clinical trials are needed to provide high-level evidence for their application in endodontics.
Bioceramics, with excellent bioactivity and biocompatibility, have been widely used in dentistry, particularly in endodontics. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is the most widely used bioceramic in endodontics. Recently, many new bioceramics have been developed, showing good potential for the treatment of endodontic diseases. This paper reviews the characteristics of bioceramics and their applications in various clinical endodontic situations, including root-end filling, root canal therapy, vital pulp therapy, apexification/regenerative endodontic treatment, perforation repair, and root defect repair. Relevant literature published from 1993 to 2023 was searched by keywords in PubMed and Web of Science. Current evidence supports the predictable outcome of MTA in the treatment of endodontic diseases. Although novel bioceramics such as Biodentine, EndoSequence, and calcium-enriched mixtures have shown promising clinical outcomes, more well-controlled clinical trials are still needed to provide high-level evidence for their application in endodontics. In addition, to better tackle the clinical challenges in endodontics, efforts are needed to improve the bioactivity of bioceramics, particularly to enhance their antimicrobial activity and mechanical properties and reduce their setting time and solubility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据