4.6 Article

Effects of the surface morphologies of ZnO nanotube arrays on the performance of amperometric glucose sensors

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2016.08.009

关键词

Glucose sensor; ZnO nanotube; Surface morphology; Surface area; Electrochemical measurement

资金

  1. NSFC Major Research Plan on Nanomanufacturing [51075324, 91323303]
  2. Key Science and Technology Program of Shaanxi Province [2015GY117]
  3. National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Projects of China [2012YQ03026101]
  4. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2015CB057400]
  5. 111 Project [B12016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amperometric glucose sensors have been fabricated with glucose oxidase (GOx) immobilized on ZnO nanotubes (ZnONTs) by physical adsorption. The ZnONTs were formed through selective dissolution of ZnO nanorods (ZnONRs) which were hydrothermally synthesized on Au cylindrical spiral (AuCS) electrodes. With the etching temperature regulated, the surface morphologies of the ZnONT arrays were tailored and their effects on the performance of the corresponding glucose sensors were investigated. It is found that at 65 degrees C the as-prepared ZnONT arrays show a Gaussian rough surface with larger surface area and better hydrophilicity, and have an effective solid liquid interface with GOx solution, which further results in desirable GOx immobilization. Therefore favorable performance of the ZnONT-based glucose sensor was obtained, such as the sensitivity 2.63 mu A/(mM cm(2)), linear range 0-6.5 mM, low detection limit 8 mu M (S/N = 3) and Michaelis-Menten constant 524 mM, which are superior to that of the ZnONR-based one. Moreover, the ZnONT-based glucose sensor exhibits good long-term stability, and excellent anti-interference ability to uric acid and ascorbic acid. The results can also be used for the performance optimization and the process standardization of other ZnONT-based amperometric biosensors. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据