4.6 Article

Using Scenario Building and Participatory Mapping to Negotiate Conservation-Development Trade-Offs in Northern Ghana

期刊

LAND
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land12030580

关键词

conservation-development trade-offs; consensus-building; participatory mapping; scenario building; integrated landscape approach; community resource management area (CREMA); northern Ghana

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In multifunctional landscapes, expanding economic activities threaten the integrity of biodiverse ecosystems, creating conservation-development trade-offs. This paper analyzes a participatory mapping process in Ghana's Western Wildlife Corridor, demonstrating how scenario building and participatory mapping can help negotiate conflicting objectives and reach a consensus. The study highlights the drivers of landscape degradation, including increasing demand for food and natural resources and climate change impacts, and emphasizes the importance of well-functioning multi-stakeholder platforms, navigating power imbalances, and recognizing different kinds and degrees of knowledge.
In multifunctional landscapes, expanding economic activities jeopardise the integrity of biodiverse ecosystems, generating conservation-development trade-offs that require multi-stakeholder dialogue and tools to negotiate conflicting objectives. Despite the rich literature on participatory mapping and other tools to reveal different stakeholder perspectives, there is limited evidence on the application of such tools in landscape-scale negotiations. This paper addresses this gap by analysing a participatory mapping process in Ghana's Western Wildlife Corridor, where a community-based landscape governance system called the community resource management area (CREMA) exists. Data from three participatory mapping workshops and focus group discussions with community and institutional actors reveal that increasing demand for food and natural resources and climate change impacts are drivers of landscape degradation, resulting in declining faunal and floral biodiversity and reduced ecosystem services. Meanwhile, community actors prioritise the expansion of farming land, while institutional actors prioritise forest conservation. However, scenario building and participatory mapping helped communicate each other's aims and reach a negotiated consensus. Finally, power relations, cultural and traditional rules, and differences in knowledge affected deliberations and decision-making. We conclude that scenario building and participatory mapping can contribute to an inclusive landscape approach, provided that well-functioning multi-stakeholder platforms are in place and facilitators adequately navigate power imbalances and recognise different kinds and degrees of knowledge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据