4.7 Article

Predictive models for physical and mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel produced by selective laser melting

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.01.028

关键词

Selective laser melting; 316L stainless steel; Predictive models; Density; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia) [EXCL/EMS-TEC/0460/2012, UID/EEA/04436/2013, SFRH/BPD/112111/2015]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [EXCL/EMS-TEC/0460/2012] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective Laser Melting (SLM) processing parameters are known to greatly influence 316L stainless steel final properties. A simple energy density calculation is insufficient for explaining mechanical and physical properties as well as microstructural characteristics, which are known to significantly influence these parts performance. In fact, parts produced by using different combinations of processing parameters, even presenting similar energy density, can display different properties. Thus, it is necessary to assess their influence as isolated parameters but also their interactions. This work presents a study on the influence of several SLM processing parameters (laser power, scanning speed and scanning spacing) on density, hardness and shear strength of 316L stainless steel. The influence of these processing parameters on the abovementioned properties is assessed by using statistical analysis. In order to find the significant main factors and their interactions, analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used. Furthermore, in order to assess the effect of the part building orientation, two different building strategies were tested. The influence of these processing parameters on shear strength, hardness and density were assessed for the two building strategies, thus resulting six different models that can be used as predictive design tools. The microstructures experimentally obtained were analyzed, discussed and correlated with the obtained models. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据