4.7 Article

Superplasticity of ultrafine-grained Al-Mg-Sc-Zr alloy

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.074

关键词

Aluminum alloy; Equal-channel angular pressing; Ultrafine-grained structure; Superplasticity; Deformation mechanism

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science, Russia [11.1533.2014/K]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The superplastic behavior of an Al-Mg-Sc-Zr alloy with a grain size of similar to 0.7 gm produced by equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) was examined in the temperature interval 150-500 degrees C at strain rates ranging from 10(-5) to 10(-1) s(-1). No significant grain coarsening occurs under static annealing up to 450 degrees C because of the strong pinning effect of Al-3(Sc, Zr) dispersoids. The alloy showed superior ductility of 365 pct at 175 degrees C, 1200 pct at 275 degrees C and similar to 3300 pct at 450 degrees C and strain rates of 1.4 x 10(-4) s(-1), 5.6 x 10(-3) s(-1) and 5.6 x 10(-1), with corresponding strain rate sensitivities of 0.3, 0.49 and 0.2, respectively. Analysis of the superplastic behavior in terms of threshold stress and surface observations showed that grain boundary sliding (GBS) controlled by grain boundary diffusion is the dominant deformation mechanism under all of the conditions. The strong pinning effect of coherent Al-3(Sc, Zr) particles leads to a high dislocation density within grains after superplastic deformation that leads to initial strain hardening at low temperatures and high threshold stress. Analysis of the superplastic behavior showed that the strong temperature dependence of the threshold stress is most likely attributable to the interaction between dislocations and the coherent dispersoids, and the effect of temperature on the optimal strain rate of superplastic deformation associated with the highest values of elongation-to-failure is attributable to absorption of a lattice dislocation by a grain boundary rather than the climb of this dislocation along the boundary. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据