4.7 Article

Deciphering micro-mechanisms of plastic deformation in a novel single phase fcc-based MnFeCoNiCu high entropy alloy using crystallographic texture

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.01.065

关键词

High entropy alloy (HEA); Texture; EBSD; Short-range ordering; Partial slip

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-phase equiatomic face centre cubic based MnFeCoNiCu multi principle multi-component high entropy alloy was subjected to thermo-mechanical processing followed with state of the art micro structural and mechanical characterization and crystal plasticity simulations to establish the complete processing-microstructure-texture-property paradigm for the newly developed alloy. A characteristic Brass type texture with strong (110) < 001 > Goss and {110} < 11 (2) over bar > Brass component was observed in 90% cold rolled sample. Microstructure of the deformed sample was characterized by absence of twinning for different rolling reductions and micro-scale shear bands were observed in the 90% rolled sample. Annealing treatment at 1173 K for different duration showed negligible change in texture and completely recrystallized microstructure with annealing twins was observed. Hardness and tensile test indicated high strength for the rolled sample and lower strength with higher ductility was observed for the annealed samples. The unique Goss-Brass deformation texture is explained on the basis of operation of partial {111} < 11 (2) over bar > slip along with conventional {111} < 11 (0) over bar > octahedral slip by crystal plasticity simulations. The operation of partial slip is attributed to short range ordering in the solid solution alloy which contributes to planar character of slip and leads to Goss-Brass deformation texture. The deformation texture is retained on recrystallization due to insignificant driving force for formation of nuclei of particular orientation and sluggish diffusion during recrystallization. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据