4.7 Article

Effect of processing route on texture and cold formability of AZ31 Mg alloy sheets processed by ECAP

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.027

关键词

ECAP; Magnesium alloy; Texture; Mechanical properties; Cold formability

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. Texture optimization of Mg alloy sheets for the improvement of mechanical and forming properties [HO 2165/47-1, LE 1395/6-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present work investigates the influence of different shearing patterns on mechanical and forming behavior at room temperature of equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) processed AZ31 sheets. Hot rolled AZ31 (Mg-3Al-1Zn, wt%) sheets, with dimensions of 200 x 200 x 1.8 mm(3), were processed at 225 degrees C with channel angle of 1100 regarding processing routes A, C and D. Shear deformation induced by ECAP weakens the texture and promotes a broad angular distribution of basal planes in the pressing direction on routes A and C. Especially, processing on route D makes basal planes tilted towards the rolling direction and transverse direction by 90 rotation in the sheet plane. Due to the increased activity of basal < a > slip, ECAP processed sheets exhibit the decrease in yield strength and r-value and increase in uniform strain and n-value in the pressing direction. As a result, route C has the largest uniform elongation in the rolling direction and route D provides a quasi-isotropic hardening behavior at room temperature. The improved formability of the ECAP processed sheets is attributed mainly to low r-value and high n-value. At Nakajima tests, route D provides higher forming limits than the as-rolled sample. The microstructure on route D exhibits a drastic reduction in the fraction of {10-12}-{10-11} double twins. This twinning mode leads to premature failure of the as-rolled sample under biaxial stretching. Consequently, microstructure-texture control induced by ECAP can enhance the cold formability of AZ31 sheets. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据