3.8 Review

A Systematic Review of the Geotechnical and Structural Behaviors of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Piles

期刊

GEOSCIENCES
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences13030078

关键词

composite piles; systematic review; standard piling materials; VOSviewer software

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Composite piles have become a popular alternative for deep foundations due to their potential to mitigate durability issues. This research evaluates the geotechnical and structural behaviors of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composite piles. Low-stiffness composite materials are a concern, and efforts are being made to improve their properties. Further research is needed to comprehensively understand the behaviors of different types of composite piles.
Composite piles have emerged as a popular alternative to conventional piling materials for deep foundations and have gained significant traction as a specific type of pile due to their potential to mitigate durability issues often associated with standard piling materials. A new type of composite piles can improve structural behavior and extend service life. This research uses an inclusive review methodology to evaluate the geotechnical and structural behaviors of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composite piles. Scopus was utilized to address the relevant keywords and state-of-the-art documents, and VSOviewer software was adopted to spot recurring patterns in the data using scientometric maps. Low-stiffness composite materials are a concern, according to the research work. Thus, researchers are working on confined concrete-filled FRP piles to improve the structural and geotechnical properties used in various load-bearing conditions. However, more research is required to comprehensively understand the behaviors of the studied types of composite piles. Indeed, there is a need for large-scale lab and field studies to determine how axial and lateral loads influence composite piles. This could help create guidelines for constructing the reviewed types of composite piles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据