4.7 Article

Nanoindentation investigation on the creep mechanism in metallic glassy films

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.11.014

关键词

Metallic glass; Nanoindentation; Creep; Free volume; Shear transformation zone

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11025212, 11272318, 11402233, 11302231, 11502235]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ15A020004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using the magnetron sputtering technique, two metallic glassy films namely Cu44.3Zr45.1Al10.6 and Cu44.2Zr43Al11.3Ti1.5 were prepared by alloy targets. The minor Ti addition effectively induces excess free volume. Upon spherical nanoindentation, the creep behaviors of both films were studied at various peak loads. As the increase of peak load, the creep deformations became more severely in both samples. Interestingly, Cu-Zr-Al-Ti film crept stronger than Cu-Zr-Al at small-load holdings (nominal elastic regimes), whereas it is opposite at high-load holdings (plastic regimes). The creep characteristic could be intrinsically related to the scale variation of the shear transformation zone (STZ) with Ti addition. Statistical analysis was employed to estimate the STZ volume, which increased by 60% with Ti addition in the Cu-Zr-Al film. The finite element modeling indicated that STZs would be activated even at the minimum load we adopted. Higher activation energy of larger STZs in Cu-Zr-Al-Ti enables less flow units, which offsets the creep enhancement by the excess free volume with Ti addition. The deeper the pressed depth of the indenter, the more contribution of the STZ operation on creep deformation. In addition, experimental observation on the creep flow rates implies that STZ could be the dominating mechanism at the steady-state creep. This study reveals that STZ volume could also be important to the time-dependent plastic deformation in metallic glass, besides as a key parameter for instantaneous plasticity. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据