3.8 Article

Swimming training reduced inflammation and apoptotic changes in pulmonary tissue in type 1 diabetic mice

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40200-023-01202-8

关键词

Swimming training; Apoptosis; Type 1 diabetes Mellitus; Lungs; Mouse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that diabetes has detrimental effects on lung tissue, and swimming exercise can alleviate these effects. Swimming exercise can reduce diabetic-related pathologies in mouse lungs by regulating apoptosis and inflammatory response.
BackgroundDespite the vulnerability of pulmonary tissue to diabetic conditions, there are few reports related to the detrimental effects of hyperglycemia and therapeutic modalities on lung parenchyma. Here, the apoptotic changes were monitored in the diabetic pulmonary tissue of mice (DM1) subjected to a four-week swimming plan.MethodsThe mice were randomly allocated into Control; Control + Swimming (S); Diabetic group (D); and Diabetic + Swimming (D + S) groups (each in 8 mice). In the D and D + S groups, mice received intraperitoneally 50 mg/kg of streptozotocin (STZ). After 14 days, swimming exercise was done for four weeks. The expression of il-1 beta, bcl-2, bax, and caspase-3 was investigated using real-time PCR analysis. A histological examination was performed using H&E staining.ResultsDM1 significantly upregulated il-1 beta, bax, and caspase-3, and down-regulated bcl-2 compared to the non-diabetic mice (p < 0.05). We noted that swimming exercises reversed the expression pattern of all genes in the diabetic mice and closed to basal levels (p < 0.05). Data indicated that swimming exercise could diminish emphysematous changes, and interstitial pneumonitis induced by STZ. Along with these changes, swimming exercise had protective effects to reduce the thickness of the inter-alveolar septum and mean alveolar area in diabetic mice.ConclusionThese data demonstrated that swimming exercises could decrease DM1-related pathologies in mouse lungs by regulating apoptosis and inflammatory response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据