Electrode array positioning after cochlear reimplantation from single manufacturer

Objective: To investigate whether revision surgery with the same device results in a change in three key indicators of electrode positioning: scalar location, mean modiolar distance ((M) over bar), and angular insertion depth (AID). Methods: Retrospective analysis of a cochlear implant database at a university-based tertiary medical center. Intra-operative CT scans were obtained after initial and revision implantation. Electrode array (EA) position was calculated using auto-segmentation techniques. Initial and revision scalar location, (M) over bar, and AID were compared. Results: Mean change in (M) over bar for all ears was -0.07 mm (SD 0.24 mm; P = 0.16). The mean change in AID for all ears was -5 degrees(SD 67 degrees; P = 0.72). Three initial implantations with pre-curved EAs resulted in a translocation from Scala Tympani (ST) to Scala Vestibuli (SV). Two remained translocated after revision, while one was corrected when revised with a straight EA. An additional five translocations occurred after revision. Conclusions: In this study examining revision cochlear implantation from a single manufacturer, we demonstrated no significant change in key indicators of EA positioning, even when revising with a different style of electrode. However, the revision EA is not necessarily confined by the initial trajectory and there may be an increased risk of translocation.

Automated summary

Objective: To investigate the impact of revision surgery with the same device on key indicators of electrode positioning in cochlear implantation. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a cochlear implant database at a university-based tertiary medical center. Intra-operative CT scans were used to compare initial and revision electrode array (EA) positioning. Results: No significant change was found in scalar location and mean modiolar distance ((M) over bar) after revision surgery. However, there was a risk of translocation and five cases exhibited changes in electrode positioning. Conclusions: Revision cochlear implantation with a different style of electrode did not result in significant changes in key indicators of electrode positioning. However, there may be an increased risk of translocation in revision cases.