4.3 Article

Controlled release behaviour and antibacterial effects of antibiotic-loaded titania nanotubes

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.01.046

关键词

Titania nanotubes; Physical adsorption; Polymer films; Controlled release; Antibacterial

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31370970]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120032120022]
  3. Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology [13JCZDJC33300, 14JCZDJC38500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial infections have been identified as the main cause of orthopaedic implant failure. Owing to their high antibiotic delivery efficiency, titania nanotubes loaded with antibiotics constitute one of the most promising strategies for suppressing bacterial infections. However, it is difficult to control the drug-release behaviour of such nanotubes. Although sealing the nanotubes with a polymer solution provides sustained release effects to a certain extent, it inevitably influences their initial antibacterial activity. This study reports on the controlled release of gentamicin sulphate (GS) from titania nanotube surfaces whereby their initial antibacterial activity remains unaffected. Titania nanotubes were fabricated via electrochemical anodization and loaded with GS through physical adsorption. Experimental results showed that this loading method is feasible and efficient. The GS-loaded titania nanotubes were further covered by a thin film comprising a mixture of GS and chitosan (GSCH). The release kinetics confirmed that the drug release could be controlled by this thin film. Moreover, such a film was shown to not only inhibit initial bacterial adherence owing to its strong antibacterial properties but also enhance cell viability. Thus, GS-loaded titania nanotubes coated with GSCH have considerable potential as biomaterials for preventing initial release and pert-implant infection in the field of orthopaedics. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据