4.3 Article

Evaluation of cystamine-modified hyaluronic acid/chitosan polyplex as retinal gene vector

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.08.047

关键词

Gene therapy; Hyaluronic acid; Polymer modification; Retina; Biocompatibility

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-BEB/098475/2008, SFRH/BD/70318/2010, PEst-OE/EQB/LA0023/2013, PEst-OE_QUI_UI4023_2011]
  2. Marie Curie Reintegration Grant [PIRG-GA-2009-249314]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-BEB/098475/2008, PEst-OE/EQB/LA0023/2013, SFRH/BD/70318/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: A successful gene therapy approach can prevent or treat congenital and acquired diseases. However, there is still no ideal non-viral vector for gene delivery in a safe and timely manner. In this report the anionic polymer hyaluronic acid (HA) was investigated as a potential vector for gene therapy. Due to its intrinsic characteristics it constitutes an excellent candidate to deliver therapeutic genes, pending the modification of its surface charge. Methods: To modify its charge, HA was modified with cystamine. Several formulations were prepared using modified HA combined with sodium sulfate, sodium triphosphate, K-carrageenan and chitosan. Vectors were characterized with respect to size, charge, DNA load and its protection, and effect on cell viability. The better performing formulations were further evaluated in vitro for their transfection efficiency in HEK293T and ARPE-19 cells. Results: Cell viability assays showed low cytotoxicity for both polymers. Gene transfer efficiency depended on cell line and formulation, but no increased transfection efficiency was observed with the modified polymer. Conclusions: HA has great potential as a gene therapy vector, but further optimization, including incorporation of a higher percentage of positive groups in HA, is needed before its use as a gene delivery vector. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据