4.1 Review

Peripheral precocious puberty in Li-Fraumeni syndrome: a case report and literature review of pure androgen-secreting adrenocortical tumors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CASE REPORTS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13256-023-03889-y

关键词

Pure androgen-secreting adrenocortical tumor; Li-Fraumeni syndrome; Peripheral precocious puberty; Pediatric endocrinology; Hypertension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a case of a 2.5-year-old boy with a pure androgen-secreting adrenocortical tumor, characterized by penile enlargement, pubic hair, frequent erections, and rapid linear growth. The diagnosis was confirmed through laboratory tests, medical imaging, and histology. Additionally, genetic testing revealed a pathogenic germline variant in the TP53 gene, confirming an underlying Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
IntroductionPure androgen-secreting adrenocortical tumors are a rare but important cause of peripheral precocious puberty.Case presentationHere, we report a pure androgen-secreting adrenocortical tumor in a 2.5-year-old boy presenting with penile enlargement, pubic hair, frequent erections, and rapid linear growth. We confirmed the diagnosis through laboratory tests, medical imaging, and histology. Furthermore, genetic testing detected a pathogenic germline variant in the TP53 gene, molecularly confirming underlying Li-Fraumeni syndrome.DiscussionOnly 15 well-documented cases of pure androgen-secreting adrenocortical tumors have been reported so far. No clinical or imaging signs were identified to differentiate adenomas from carcinomas, and no other cases of Li-Fraumeni syndrome were diagnosed in the four patients that underwent genetic testing. However, diagnosing Li-Fraumeni syndrome is important as it implies a need for intensive tumor surveillance and avoidance of ionizing radiation.ConclusionIn this article, we emphasize the need to screen for TP53 gene variants in children with androgen-producing adrenal adenomas and report an association with arterial hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据