3.8 Article

The Censorship of a Closeted Spain: The Case of Elena Fortun (1886-1952)

期刊

PRIMERJALNA KNJIZEVNOST
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 133-150

出版社

SLOVENE COMPARATIVE LITERATURE ASSOC
DOI: 10.3986/pkn.v46.i1.08

关键词

Spanish literature; Spanish women writers; Fortun; Elena; sexual identity; lesbianism; Franco regime; censorship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores the impact of self-censorship and state censorship on the literary legacy of children's book author Elena Fortun from Spain. The concept of the homosexual closet is used to understand how censorship influenced Fortun's work as a lesbian writer contributing to various narratives of Spanish femininity over the past century. The analysis includes Fortun's children's books, correspondence, and two posthumously published novels. It reveals how censorship functions as a controlling gaze both from external forces and internalized in individuals, keeping the doors of the homosexual closet closed.
This article focuses on how self-censorship and state censorship have shaped the literary legacy of the Spanish author of children's books, Elena Fortun. The homosexual closet is presented as a key concept for understanding the impact of censorship on the work of a lesbian writer such as Fortun who has contributed to various narratives of Spanish femininity over the course of almost a century. The first of these is the narrative of gender dissidence during the Second Republic (1931-1939); followed by the narrative of the wife and mother belonging to the Franco Regime (1939-1975); and finally the LGBTQ inclusiveness of the new millennium in Spain (2005-2022). The works included in the analysis are varied, spanning from Fortun's children's books to her correspondence and finally two posthumously published novels. This reading of Fortun's texts reveals how censorship works as a controlling gaze that not only operates from the outside, but is also internalized in the individual, maintaining the doors of the homosexual closet closed from the inside.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据