On Becoming Princesse Bibesco: The Intimacy of Modern Identity, Between the Self and the World

With the exception of Eva Behring who does not regard Martha Bibescu (1886- 1973) as an exile writer, the few dictionaries and lexicons tackling Romanian exile writers only mention this turn-of-the century Romanian-French woman writer's name with modest assertiveness. This narrative of her censorship is probably the story of any exile woman writer, yet with a few entanglements created by her special social status (she became a Princess by marriage), by her outstanding political allegiances, and by her Bovaric spirit: malicious critics commented that her epitaph is a composition of four personae, none of them authentic. In this article, we present reasons and contexts of/for Martha Bibescu's exclusion from the Romanian national literary canon. Moreover, assuming a new geographical consciousness that might bring to the fore the transnational routes of emancipation, our specific aim in the present article is to move away from the enduring narrative of censorship in Martha Bibescu's case and to propose her as a candidate figure for a transnational literary canon, forging a specific, modern, intimate ecriture. Our stance is that shaping a complex intimacy, in-between the ways of the Self and the ways of the world, represents these women writers' major contribution to modernity and should be counted as one of the characteristics of modernism.

Automated summary

This article discusses the reasons and contexts for Martha Bibescu's exclusion from the Romanian national literary canon, and proposes her as a candidate figure for a transnational literary canon, emphasizing her contribution to modernity through shaping a complex intimacy between the Self and the world.