3.8 Article

'A Strong Wish for Wings': The Epistolary Relationship and Intellectual Collaboration between Mary Taylor and Charlotte Bronte

期刊

BRONTE STUDIES
卷 48, 期 3, 页码 177-188

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14748932.2023.2215835

关键词

female friendship; Mary Taylor; Charlotte Bronte; epistolary writing; Victorian feminism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores the impact of the correspondence between Mary Taylor and Charlotte Bronte on their intellectual lives and writing. Evidence from their works, Shirley (1849) and Miss Miles (1890), showcases the collaborative dynamic between the two writers, which not only influenced their work but also helped them gain literary legitimacy in a publishing context hostile to women's voices. Their letters indicate the explicit influence of each other's thinking on their writing, suggesting a sense of belonging to an intellectual partnership through sustained correspondence. Simon-Martin's theory of 'epistolary education' highlights the formative role of their friendship in developing feminist consciousness, social reform advocacy, and authorial agency.
This article disinters the impact of the correspondence between Mary Taylor and Charlotte Bronte on their respective intellectual lives and writing. Supplementing the epistolary archive, textual evidence from Shirley (1849) and Miss Miles (1890) demonstrates the powerful collaborative dynamic between the two writers, which not only affected their work but also helped them to cultivate a sense of literary legitimacy in a publishing context habitually hostile to women's voices. Bronte and Taylor's letters indicate the explicit influence of one another's thinking upon their writing, and suggest that the writers shared a sense of belonging to an intellectual partnership through their sustained correspondence. Simon-Martin's theory of 'epistolary education' illuminates how Taylor and Bronte's friendship through letters was formative in developing both writers' feminist consciousness and their agitation for social reform, as well as their authorial agency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据