3.8 Article

Evaluation of Children with Secondary Osteoporosis: A Single-center Experience

期刊

MEDICAL JOURNAL OF BAKIRKOY
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 51-56

出版社

GALENOS PUBL HOUSE
DOI: 10.4274/BMJ.galenos.2023.2023.1-12

关键词

Bisphosphonates; secondary osteoporosis; pediatric endocrinology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the clinical characteristics and treatment responses of children with chronic diseases, finding that they are at risk of inadequate bone mineralization. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to assess bone mineral density, and it was found that bisphosphonate treatment significantly improved bone density.
Objective: Children with chronic diseases are at a risk of inadequate bone mineralization due to the effects of the primary disease and/or treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment responses of patients with secondary osteoporosis.Methods: Forty-four patients with chronic diseases who had bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score of <=-2.0 on the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were included.Results: Age at diagnosis of osteoporosis was 9.2 +/- 4.9 years (1.4-17.7 years). Chronic disease groups were defined as gastrointestinal (29.5%), neurological (22.7%), hematologic (18.2%), inborn errors in metabolism (11.4%), rheumatologic (9.1%), and renal (9.1%). The rate of receiving steroid treatment was 63.6%. DXA Z-score was-2.8 +/- 0.9. The fracture frequency in the long bones was 20.5%. Bisphosphonate (BP) treatment was given in 34.1% (n=15) of the patients. BP was the most commonly used in neurological diseases (50%). A significant difference was found between the initial and final DXA Z-scores in BP patients (-3.3 +/- 1.0 and-2.4 +/- 0.9; p=0.004). Conclusion: In our study, a heterogeneous group of chronic systemic diseases was evaluated, and BP treatment provided a significant improvement in BMD. Further prospective studies are still required in which clinical and radiological improvements are evaluated in large groups of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据