3.8 Article

GOD IS BEAUTIFUL, UGLY, DEAD: NAVID KERMANI, FERIDUN ZAIMOGLU AND (MORE THAN) CHRISTIAN ART

期刊

GERMAN LIFE AND LETTERS
卷 76, 期 3, 页码 410-430

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/glal.12383

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Navid Kermani's and Feridun Zaimoglu's engagements with Christian art as Muslims explore the potential and limitations of aesthetic experiences of the divine that go beyond doctrinal boundaries. Kermani's research reveals the ability of art to provide spiritual insight but also highlights subjective and epistemological barriers that restrict this potential, as seen in his rejection of certain Christian imagery. However, both Kermani and Zaimoglu offer syncretic interpretations that bridge Christian and Islamic ideas, pointing towards new understandings of the divine. Zaimoglu's contemporary icons further challenge religious boundaries and offer ambiguous connections to Christianity and Islam.
Navid Kermani's and Feridun Zaimoglu's engagements as Muslims with Christian art reveal the possibilities and limitations of aesthetic experiences of the divine beyond all doctrinal divides. Although Kermani's own research into the aesthetic dimension of Islam highlights the potential for art to offer spiritual insight, his rejection of some Christian imagery, especially of the crucifix, in his book Unglaubiges Staunen: uber das Christentum (2015), suggests this potential has limits which are not only matters of subjective taste but also epistemological barriers that are difficult to overcome. However, some of Kermani's interpretations lead to a syncretic understanding of Christian and Islamic ideas and aesthetics, pointing towards new notions of the divine. Similarly, Zaimoglu's series of contemporary icons featuring Jesus and other Biblical figures opens up spiritual possibilities beyond religious divides through their ambiguous links to Christianity and Islam. This distinction between an experience of the divine across religious boundaries and its failure can be theorised through Jean-Luc Marion's understanding of the 'icon' and the 'idol' respectively, whereby the former returns the viewer's gaze and unleashes a destabilising openness to the sacred, whereas the latter involves the dominant gaze of the viewer and reinforces what they already know.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据