4.6 Article

Structural, dielectric and impedance characteristics of CoTiO3

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 131-139

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.04.005

关键词

X-ray diffraction; Microstructure; Dielectric properties; Electrical conductivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present work reports the synthesis and characterization of the ilmenite-type rhombohedral structured CoTiO3 ceramic. The polycrystalline powder of CoTiO3 was prepared by the mixed-oxide technique. X-ray structural analysis of the compound confirmed the formation of a single-phase compound. The study of microstructure by scanning electron microscopy shows that the compound has well defined grains which are distributed uniformly throughout the surface. It shows that the grain size lies in the range of 8-10 mu m. The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) studies confirm the presence of Ti-O, Ti-O-Ti, Ti-O-O, Co-O bond in the studied compound. The frequency dependence of dielectric constant was explained on the basis of Maxwell Wagner mechanism and Koop's phenomenological theory. The frequency-temperature dependence of impedance analysis shows that the bulk effect dominates up to 250 degrees C, and the appearance of second semicircular arc above 280 degrees C indicates the presence of grain boundary effect in the sample. The depressed semicircles in Nyquist plot with depression angles clearly indicate the distribution of relaxation times in the ceramic samples. It also shows that the material has negative temperature co-efficient of resistance similar to that of semiconductors. Similar behavior has also been observed in the study of I-V characteristics of the material. Through the study of dc conductivity of CoTiO3 and using the relation; In sigma(dc) alpha E-a/KBT, activation energy of the compound was calculated. The frequency dependence of ac conductivity is explained on the basis of Correlated barrier Hopping Model. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据