3.8 Article

Adaptive water management in response to climate change: the case of the southern Murray darling Basin

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/13241583.2023.2181844

关键词

Environmental flow; restoration; planning; adaptive management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Australia has implemented the Murray Darling Basin Plan to address water resource overallocation in the Murray-Darling Basin. However, the impacts of climate change on surface runoff and water demand may undermine the achievements of the plan. It is crucial to learn from the past two decades and adapt to climate change. Managers have three options: continue with current adaptive management, focus on a subset of sites, or shift to a more functional flow regime. Climate change requires more than incremental adaptation and necessitates substantial changes to the Basin Plan.
For over two decades, Australia has sought to address the effects of the over allocation of water resources in the Murray-Darling Basin through implementation of the Murray Darling Basin Plan (2012). It is increasingly apparent that the impacts of climate change on surface runoff and water demand will profoundly impact rivers, potentially negating the Basin Plan's achievements. It will be critical that we use the lessons from the last two decades to inform adaptation to climate change. Environmental water allocations over the last decade have focussed on providing base flows, freshes, and overbank flows, within a Natural Flow Regime paradigm. In a climate-changed world managers have three broad options. The first would be to continue to pursue single loop adaptive management making improvements within the existing framework. The second option would be to adapt the system approach to focus on a subset of sites, akin to maintaining aquatic reserves. The third option would be to move flow management away from the natural flow paradigm to a more functional regime. This approach would invoke the second adaptive management loop by evaluating options for adaptation and developing processes for navigating trade-offs among social, economic, cultural, and environmental values and between protection, restoration, and adaptation. Changes in water availability because of climate change will require more than incremental adaptation (first loop adaptive management) and will necessitate consideration of either protecting a smaller suite of spatial areas or a smaller set of functional outcomes. This requires profound change to some of the Basin Plan's approaches to environmental flow management. The review of the Basin Plan in 2026 provides a rare opportunity to adapt the Basin Plan from a foundation of protect and restore to one that includes adaptation, and this will require substantive changes to the Basin Plan (second loop adaptive management).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据