4.7 Article

Digital image analysis to quantify carbide networks in ultrahigh carbon steels

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 134-143

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.04.012

关键词

Ultrahigh carbon steel; Carbide network; Network analysis; Image segmentation; Fracture toughness; Percolation theory

资金

  1. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development (DCED), Developed in PA Program (D2PA)
  2. National Science Foundation, CMMI [1436064]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1436064] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method has been developed and demonstrated to quantify the degree of carbide network connectivity in ultrahigh carbon steels through digital image processing and analysis of experimental micrographs. It was shown that the network connectivity and carbon content can be correlated to toughness for various ultrahigh carbon steel specimens. The image analysis approach first involved segmenting the carbide network and pearlite matrix into binary contrast representations via a grayscale intensity thresholding operation. Next, the carbide network pixels were skeletonized and parceled into braches and nodes, allowing the determination of a connectivity index for the carbide network. Intermediate image processing steps to remove noise and fill voids in the network are also detailed. The connectivity indexes of scanning electron micrographs were consistent in both secondary and backscattered electron imaging modes, as well as across two different (50x and 100x) magnifications. Results from ultrahigh carbon steels reported here along with other results from the literature generally showed lower connectivity indexes correlated with higher Charpy impact energy (toughness). A deviation from this trend was observed at higher connectivity indexes, consistent with a percolation threshold for crack propagation across the carbide network. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据