4.7 Article

Improvement on room-temperature ductility of 6.5 wt.% Si steel by stress-relief annealing treatments after warm rolling

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 206-214

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.11.006

关键词

6.5 wt% Si steel; Strip casting; Ordering; Stress-relief annealing; Ductility

资金

  1. National High Technology RD 863 Program [2012AA03A506]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In our previous work, we demonstrated that thin sheets of 6.5 wt.% Si steel could be fabricated by cold rolling with deformation induced disordering (DID). However, because the warm rolled sheets possessed high hardness, edge cracks were still formed in the cold rolled sheets. Therefore, hardness of warm rolled sheets needed to be decreased to further improve the ductility at room temperature. In the present work, disordered 6.5 wt.% Si sheets with the thickness of 0.35 mm were fabricated by strip casting, hot rolling and warm rolling. Stress-relief annealing treatments were carried out at temperatures from 300 degrees C to 550 degrees C, and influences of annealing temperatures on the ductility of warm rolled sheets were investigated. It had been observed that the room-temperature bending properties experienced over-hill changes, although dislocation densities in the annealed specimens were indeed decreased with the increase of annealing temperatures. The specimen annealed at 350 degrees C exhibited the lowest macro Vickers hardness and highest fracture deflection among all specimens, with a certain amount of dimples having been observed on the fracture surfaces after bending. Ordered domains could be observed when the annealing temperature was higher than 400 degrees C, and they grew with the increase of annealing temperatures. The integrated effect of decrease in dislocation density and suppression of re-ordering was realized at 350 degrees C, which was believed to be responsible for the highest room-temperature ductility, the best surface quality, and the least edge cracking for the cold rolled sheets. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据