4.5 Review

MASS SPECTROMETRIC EPITOPE MAPPING

期刊

MASS SPECTROMETRY REVIEWS
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 229-241

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mas.21516

关键词

epitope extraction; epitope excision; mass spectrometry; consecutive epitope; linear epitope; assembled epitope; discontinuous epitope; conformational epitope

资金

  1. DAAD [91548123, 91523785]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mass spectrometric epitope mapping has become a versatile method to precisely determine a soluble antigen's partial structure that directly interacts with an antibody in solution. Typical lengths of investigated antigens have increased up to several 100 amino acids while experimentally determined epitope peptides have decreased in length to on average 10-15 amino acids. Since the early 1990s more and more sophisticated methods have been developed and have forwarded a bouquet of suitable approaches for epitope mapping with immobilized, temporarily immobilized, and free-floating antibodies. While up to now monoclonal antibodies have been mostly used in epitope mapping experiments, the applicability of polyclonal antibodies has been proven. The antibody's resistance towards enzymatic proteolysis has been of key importance for the two mostly applied methods: epitope excision and epitope extraction. Sample consumption has dropped to low pmol amounts on both, the antigen and the antibody. While adequate in-solution sample handling has been most important for successful epitope mapping, mass spectrometric analysis has been found the most suitable read-out method from early on. The rapidity by which mass spectrometric epitope mapping nowadays is executed outperforms all alternative methods. Thus, it can be asserted that mass spectrometric epitope mapping has reached a state of maturity, which allows it to be used in any mass spectrometry laboratory. After 25 years of constant and steady improvements, its application to clinical samples, for example, for patient characterization and stratification, is anticipated in the near future. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据