3.8 Review

Advancing Nitinol Implant Design and Simulation Through Data-Driven Methodologies

期刊

SHAPE MEMORY AND SUPERELASTICITY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40830-023-00421-5

关键词

Nitinol; Shape memory alloys; Modeling; Data-driven

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in data science methods for acquiring and analyzing large amounts of material deformation data have the potential to greatly benefit the design and simulation of Nitinol implants. This review explores various data-driven methodologies and proposes their adaptation to Nitinol design and simulation. The review is organized into three tiers, covering methods for data acquisition, combining data from multiple sources, and data-driven simulation of Nitinol deformation. Widespread adoption of these methods by the Nitinol cardiovascular implant community can be facilitated through consensus building and open exchange of computational tools.
Recent advances in the Data Science methods for acquiring and analyzing large amounts of materials deformation data have the potential to tremendously benefit Nitinol (Nickel-Titanium shape memory alloy) implant design and simulation. We review some of these data-driven methodologies and provide a perspective on adapting these techniques to Nitinol design and simulation. We organize the review in a three-tiered approach. The methods in the first tier relate to data acquisition. We review methods for acquiring full-field deformation data from implants and methods for quantifying uncertainty in such data. The second-tier methods relate to combining data from multiple sources to gain a holistic understanding of complex deformation phenomena such as fatigue. Methods in the third tier relate to making data-driven simulation of the deformation response of Nitinol. A wide adaption of these methods by the Nitinol cardiovascular implant community may be facilitated by building consensus on best practices and open exchange of computational tools.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据