4.2 Article

From 'ILCs' to 'IPLCs': A Victory for Indigenous Peoples' Rights Advocacy Under the Convention on Biological Diversity?

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 275-284

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jel/eqad009

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Indigenous and local communities (ILCs) are recognized as special right-holders under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). However, the recent inclusion of the term 'Indigenous Peoples' in the CBD framework does not truly advance Indigenous Peoples' rights due to complicated restrictions on treaty interpretation. This indicates a growing divergence in the understanding of the rights of IPLCs in international law.
Indigenous and local communities (ILCs) are special right-holders under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Since 2010, the CBD parties have been called upon to adopt the terminology 'Indigenous Peoples and local communities' (IPLCs) to better reflect the international human rights development, especially with respect to Indigenous Peoples. The CBD parties agreed to this terminological change in 2014. The very recent CBD decisions and voluntary guidelines have reflected this commitment. This analysis suggests that the inclusion of the term 'Indigenous Peoples' in the CBD framework may seem like a victory for Indigenous Peoples' rights advocacy, but it really is not because important human rights implications have been blocked via complicated restrictions on treaty interpretation. Instead, it indicates a growing divergence in the understanding of the rights of IPLCs in international law.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据