3.8 Article

In an endotoxaemic model, antibiotic clearance can be affected by different central venous catheter positions, during renal replacement therapy

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s40635-023-00516-4

关键词

Central venous catheter; Intensive care; Continuous renal replacement therapy antibiotic concentration; Sepsis; Dialysis; Acute kidney injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the impact of different catheter placements on drug clearance during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) using central venous catheter and central venous dialysis catheter. The results showed that drug clearance was higher when both catheter tips were close together in the same external jugular vein, compared to when catheters were placed in different vessels. This suggests that close catheter placement may lead to unreliable drug concentration during CRRT.
BackgroundIn intensive care, different central venous catheters (CVC) are often used for infusion of drugs. If a patient is treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) a second catheter, a central venous dialysis catheter (CVDC), is needed. Placing the catheters close together might pose a risk that a drug infused in a CVC could be directly aspirated into a CRRT machine and cleared from the blood without giving the effect intended. The purpose of this study was to elucidate if drug clearance is affected by different catheter placement, during CRRT. In this endotoxaemic animal model, an infusion of antibiotics was administered in a CVC placed in the external jugular vein (EJV). Antibiotic clearance was compared, whether CRRT was through a CVDC placed in the same EJV, or in a femoral vein (FV). To reach a target mean arterial pressure (MAP), noradrenaline was infused through the CVC and the dose was compared between the CDVDs.ResultsThe main finding in this study was that clearance of antibiotics was higher when both catheter tips were in the EJV, close together, compared to in different vessels, during CRRT. The clearance of gentamicin was 21.0 +/- 7.3 vs 15.5 +/- 4.2 mL/min (p 0.006) and vancomycin 19.3 +/- 4.9 vs 15.8 +/- 7.1 mL/min (p 0.021). The noradrenaline dose to maintain a target MAP also showed greater variance with both catheters in the EJV, compared to when catheters were placed in different vessels.ConclusionThe results in this study indicate that close placement of central venous catheter tips could lead to unreliable drug concentration, due to direct aspiration, during CRRT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据