4.1 Article

Pan-transcriptomic analysis identifies coordinated and orthologous functional modules in the diatoms Thalassiosira pseudonana and Phaeodactylum tricornutum

期刊

MARINE GENOMICS
卷 26, 期 -, 页码 21-28

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.margen.2015.10.011

关键词

Diatom; Transcriptomics; Clustering; Microarrays; Gene regulation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [OCB-0928561, MCB-1316206]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1262637] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1316206] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diatoms are important primary producers in the ocean that thrive in diverse and dynamic environments. Their survival and success over changing conditions depend on the complex coordination of gene regulatory processes. Here we present an integrated analysis of all publicly available microarray data for the diatoms Thalassiosira pseudonana and Phaeodactylum tricornutum. This resource includes shared expression patterns, gene functions, and cis-regulatory DNA sequence motifs in each species that are statistically coordinated over many experiments. These data illustrate the coordination of transcriptional responses in diatoms over changing environmental conditions. Responses to silicic acid depletion segregate into multiple distinctly regulated groups of genes, regulation by heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) is implicated in the response to nitrate stress, and distinctly coordinated carbon concentrating, CO2 and pH-related responses are apparent. Fundamental features of diatom physiology are similarly coordinated between two distantly related diatom species, including the regulation of photosynthesis, cellular growth functions and lipid metabolism. These integrated data and analyses can be explored publicly (http://networks.systemsbiologymet/diatom-portal/). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据