4.7 Article

Palaeo-ecological quality status based on foraminifera of Boulognesur-Mer harbour (Pas-de-Calais, Northeastern France) over the last 200 years

期刊

MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 32-43

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.04.002

关键词

Harbour area; Pollution; Multiproxy approach; Sediment grain size; Metals; Benthic fossil foraminifera; Palaeo-ecological quality status

资金

  1. IRePSE Institute (Institut de Recherches Pluridisciplinaires en Sciences de l'Environnement) from University of Lille
  2. Region Nord-Pas-de-Calais-Picardie, France
  3. University of Lille

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the last centuries, coastal areas have experienced dramatic degradations of their environmental quality, which has led to a huge reduction of marine biodiversity. The objective of the present study was to use geochemical parameters and benthic fossil foraminifera to assess environmental changes that have occurred over the last 200 years in a harbour area (Boulogne-sur-Mer, Northern France) heavily modified by human activities. A multidisciplinary approach including major and trace metals, grain-size, total organic carbon and benthic fossil foraminifera, has been performed on a 33-cm long core. The dating was carried out using the activity of Pb-210 and Cs-137. Embayment of the area and increase of trace metals concentrations induced a shift in benthic communities. Human activities modified a sandy nearshore bank, colonized by typical marine foraminiferal species, such as Cribroelphiudium excavatum, into a sheltered environment, dominated by brackish end-members, such as Haynesina germanica. Along the sedimentary record, the interaction between meiofaunal and geochemical elements made it possible to distinguish between a pre-impacted period and an industrial period. The upper part of the core reflects better ecological conditions, indicating an environmental recovery. Our results provide baselines for future environmental bio-monitoring in the area. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据